THE DEMONSTRATION OF SELF-COMPLEXITY- A WINNICOTTIAN PERSPECTIVE WITH POST COLONIAL MUSINGS ON THE SELECT WORKS OF SHASHI DESHPANDE

Abstract

The present paper examines the selected novels of Shashi Despande under the clinical dimension of British psychoanalyst, Donald Winnicott’s psychoanalytic premises. The research is done on the integration of psychology, gender studies, and Indian literature. Though early studies have explored the extension of both interdisciplinary realms, no integrative work has focused on the Winnicottian view of Selfhood and woman in literature.  Therefore, there is a need to address the actual psychological transformation that occurs in the personas of literature in the Winnicottian perspective. Postmodern writings especially Indian discourse in English literature also demonstrates exemplary responsiveness to self-complexity.  A psychoanalytic explanation is crucial to analyze the plot construction as well as its developmental conceptualization. The Winnicottian framework to the present study attributes a clinical sensitivity over the narrative and thematic dimensions of self-experience. Winnicott’s concept of self and transitional space has more application to the gender issue of women in its base of psychological structure. The tension between the liberating and constraining views of selfhood is exemplified by the living dynamic Indian woman writer, Shashi Despande to create an entire body of fiction. Her writings are based not only on observations of external behavior but also on Despande. The study attempts to illustrate a thematic and theoretical framework of the internal journey of feminine sensibilities.  The inner turmoil of a woman resulted as a clash between her own knowledge and social reality is portrayed as a major theme in the works of Shashi ‘struggled self’ of a woman in between her psychological growth and societal constraints. It is a straightforward journey into the psyche of Indian women characters that are torn by the discord between the individual and the surrounding. In the scenario, the present study is primarily concerned upon the female protagonists of Despande’s selected novels that include  Indu in ‘Roots and Shadows’; Saru in ‘The Dark Holds No Terror’; Jaya in ‘That Long Silence’; Sumi in ‘A Matter of Time’ and Urmila in ‘The Binding Vine’ respectively.

Keywords

demonstration, self-complexity, winnicottian perspective, postcolonial, shashi deshpande

References

Friedan Betty. (1963). The Feminine Mystique. New York:W.W. Norton and Company.

Shashi Despande, “Of Concerns, of Anxieties,” Indian Literature, vol. XXXIX, no.5, Sep-Oct 1996, p.108.

J. R. Greenberg and S. A. Mitchell. (1983). Object Relations in Psychoanalytic Theory. pp. 437; £21.25.) Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass.

Winnicott, Donald W. (1947). ‘Hate in the Countertransference’, in Winnicott (1975), pp. 194-203.B. Smith, “An approach to graphs of linear forms (Unpublished work style),” unpublished.

______ (1951). ‘Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena’, in Winnicott. (1975), pp. 229-242.

______ (1952). ‘Psychoses and Child Care’, in Winnicott. (1975), pp. 219-28.

______ (1965). The Maturational Processes and the Facilitating Environment: Studies in the Theory of Emotional Development. Hogarth.

______ (1971). Playing and Reality. Tavistock Publications; reprinted Penguin, 1971.

______ (1975). Through Paediatrics to Psycho-Analysis. Hogarth.

______ (1989). ‘The Fate of the Transitional Object’, in Psycho-Analytic Explorations. Karnac, pp. 53-8.

Guttal, Vijaya. “Shashi Deshpande’s  The Binding Vine and A Matter of Time: A Reading in the Postcolonial Context”. Writing Difference. Ed. Chanchala K. Naik.

Baudrillard, Jean. (1981). For a Critique of the Political Economy of the Sign. St. Louis: Telos Press. 1983. Simulations. New York: Semiotext.

Jameson, Fredric. (1984). “Postmodernism, or The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” New Left Review, Number 146: 51-92.

Denzin, Basil. (1991). Class, Codes and Control, Volume 1: Theoretical Studies Towards a Sociology of Language. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Kurzweil, Edith. (1980). The Age of Structuralism; Levi-Strauss to Foucault. New York: Columbia University Press.

Winnicott, Donald W. (1965). The theory of infant-parent relationship. In his Maturational processes and the facilitating environment (pp. 17-55). London: Hogarth and the Institute of Psycho-Analysis. (Original work published 1960).

Gomez, L. (1996). ‘John Bowlby’, in her An Introduction to Object Relations, London: Free Association Books.

McLeod, J. (2010). Case Study Research in Counselling & Psychotherapy. London: Sage.

Sathupati Prasanna Sree. (2003). Woman in the Novels of Shashi Deshpande: A Study. New Delhi : Sarup & Sons. p.121.

-“Interview”, The Sunday Observer, 11 February 1990. Eve’s Weekly, 18-24 June 1988, p.27.

To cite this article

Anandhi, M. (2020). The Demonstration of Self-Complexity-A Winnicottian Perspective with Post Colonial Musings on the Select Works of Shashi Deshpande. John Foundation Journal of EduSpark, 2(2), 1-8.